首页> 外文OA文献 >Economics of GHG emissions mitigation via biogas production from Sorghum, maize and dairy farm manure digestion in the Po valley
【2h】

Economics of GHG emissions mitigation via biogas production from Sorghum, maize and dairy farm manure digestion in the Po valley

机译:通过波谷地区高粱,玉米和奶牛场粪便消化产生沼气来减少温室气体排放的经济学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and economic feasibility of electricity production from the anaerobic digestion of different substrates are studied in this paper. Three realistic substrate options for the climatic and soil conditions of a modelled farm in the Po Valley in Italy are analysed: manure from a dairy farm, Sorghum and maize.\ud\udA detailed cost analysis is performed with field data provided by farmers and suppliers and literature sources. The capital costs (CAPEX) and the operational costs (OPEX), disaggregated by their components, are presented. Investment payback time is then calculated for the different substrates and technologies, while taking into account the Italian government feed-in tariff scheme for biogas plants implemented in 2013.\ud\udIn the specific conditions assumed, electricity production via anaerobic digestion of manure and co-digestion of manure with at most 30% Sorghum (no till) provide both GHG savings (in comparison to the Italian electricity mix) and profit for economic operators.\ud\udThe anaerobic digestion of silage maize or Sorghum alone, instead, provides no (or very limited) GHG savings, and, with the current feed-in tariffs, generates economic losses.\ud\udBoth economic and environmental performance are improved by the following practices: cultivating Sorghum instead of maize; implementing no till agriculture; and installing gas-tight tanks for digestate storage. A tool allowing a customised calculation of the economic performances of biogas plants is provided.
机译:研究了不同底物的厌氧消化产生的温室气体(GHG)排放和电力生产的经济可行性。针对意大利Po Valley示范农场的气候和土壤条件,分析了三种可行的基质选择:奶牛场,高粱和玉米的粪肥。\ ud \ ud详细的成本分析是由农民和供应商提供的实地数据进行的和文献来源。列出了按组成部分分类的资本成本(CAPEX)和运营成本(OPEX)。然后,针对不同的基质和技术,计算出投资回收期,同时考虑到意大利政府于2013年实施的沼气厂上网电价方案。\ ud \ ud在假定的特定条件下,通过厌氧消化粪便和有机物来发电-消化高粱含量最高为30%的肥料(不耕种)不仅可以节省温室气体(与意大利的电力结构相比),而且可以为经济经营者带来利润。\ ud \ ud仅青贮玉米或高粱的厌氧消化不能提供任何服务。 (或非常有限)温室气体的节省,并按照当前的上网电价征收,会造成经济损失。\ ud \ ud通过以下做法可以提高经济和环境绩效:种植高粱而不是玉米;实施免耕农业;以及安装用于储存消化液的气密罐。提供了一种工具,允许对沼气厂的经济绩效进行定制计算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号